Hi, Tom!
I found your commentary about a phase shift in the 40 week S&P cycle to
be quite interesting, as I've been at odds with the stock market lately and I've
been trying to figure out what's wrong (I think what is mostly wrong is that
I've become more of a fundamentalist in regards to the housing downturn, which
is clouding my thinking on the technical side).
To try to improve my
cycle analysis capabilities, I've recently purchased the TechSignal software
from the Foundation for the Study of Cycles. Do you already use the program?
I've only started to learn how to use the software, but it is quite
fascinating. Attached is a screen shot from the program of the weekly S&P
(from April '82 to November '06; not up-to-date because I'm just using the
sample data that came with the program, but the cycles shouldn't have changed
that much, especially on these weekly charts).
The listing shows the top
cycles that TechSignal finds in that data, ranked by the Bartels Index (the
lower the number the better, as it suggests that the correlation is not
random). I only plotted the synthesis of the 40.40 and the 19.35 cycles,
corresponding to the 40 and 20 week cycles you were looking at.
It
confirms your projections, roughly, but without the phase shift. I'm not
experienced with the program nor smart enough to figure out why it matches your
predictions, without the phase shift, but it seemed worth bringing to your
attention. I'm guessing that the cycles are dominant enough over a long period
of time that it is difficult to determine when to apply a phase shift and when
to revert back to the regular cycle pattern. Or it could be dependent on what
date the analysis starts, I don't know. The more I delve into this cycle
analysis, the more complex it becomes... Kind of like my home remodeling
projects... :-)
Best regards,
My understanding is that the software you are using assumes that the subject cycles always
exist, albeit with some variability in their actual timing, and does not account
for wholesale behavior changes like the phase shift hypothesis I put forward.
It appears from the chart that the software also assumes that the 20-week cycle
(or its equivalent) is independent of the 40-week's schedule. Based on what I
learned in Mechanics of Vibrations class at West Point, this is not a proper
understanding of how a half-period harmonic should work. They may be right, but
that is not my understanding of it.
My own studies of the 40 week cycle
show that once a phase shift occurs, you can forget about the old schedule; it
no longer matters. The period of that cycle persists in the new cycle, sort of
like when your heart misses a beat but your average pulse rate does not change. 
This is definitely an "out there" sort of understanding of how it works,
but it is the best explanation I can offer for what I observe in the data.
The key for me is understanding that phase shifts tend to occur every
6-8 years, and so at some point when you realize it has been a while since you
have seen one, you need to start factoring its possible appearance into the
analysis. Such factoring can take the form of not trusting the cycle as much,
and relying on other tools more. It can also take the form of requiring more
confirmation of the cycle's arrival than one might otherwise employ. I wish I
had done more of that this past summer instead of counting on the 40-week cycle
to bottom in September-October.
Were it not for the phase shift
phenomenon, the 40-week cycle would be so regular and so reliable that many
would come to count on it and know about it. Such knowledge (and the actions
taken based on the knowledge) would naturally kill the cycle. So in order to
stay alive, the 40-week cycle must remain unreliable enough to fool sufficient
numbers of people into not believing in it.
Tom McClellan
Editor
McClellan Market Report
Chart Interpretation
Data Questions
Related Articles
I have heard some analysts talk about a 40-month cycle in the stock market. Have you ever looked at this? The Foundation for the Study of...
Tom,I was wondering if you could clear up some confusion for me re: 40-week cycles. Looking at your latest 20/40 week cycle chart, you show a...
We heard a lot of discussion in the technical analysis community back in January 2005 about the notion of a January low in proximity to lows. ...