Charts in Focus
May 04, 2012
A Seasonal Quandary
Apr 27, 2012
Gold Repeats A Prior Pattern
Apr 20, 2012
Summation Index Promises Higher Highs After Correction Ends
Apr 13, 2012:
Fed and ECB Balance Sheets
Apr 06, 2012:
Deserved or Not, T-Bonds Are Set Up For A Rally
Mar 30, 2012:
Lumber Says This Is A Top For Housing Stocks
Mar 23, 2012:
SP500 Undervalued Versus M2
Mar 16, 2012:
In Order To Tame Inflation, Just Tame Uncle Sam
Mar 09, 2012:
Gold ETF Investors Were Not Scared Away
Common Only McClellan Oscillator

Free Chart In Focus email
Delivered to you every week
One of the questions we get asked frequently is about using Advance-Decline (A-D) data for common stocks versus for all listed issues on the NYSE. There are many issues on the NYSE that trade like stocks, but which are not what we would all think of as representing ownership in operating companies. These include bond related closed end funds (Bond CEFs), rights, warrants, structured products, and preferred stocks of operating companies.
A belief that is increasingly voiced by some users of A-D data is that these "uncommon" issues somehow contaminate the A-D data, and so to get the correct indications one should purify the numbers somehow so as not to be misled about the stock market by things that are not real stocks. My view is that this issue has been overplayed, and is not as much of a problem as some people assert.
This week's chart looks at the Common Only version of the McClellan A-D Oscillator. For comparison below is the standard McClellan Oscillator which uses the "all issues" A-D data. While the raw A-D Lines for the two groups can sometimes look different, the McClellan Oscillator measures the accelerations that take place in the A-D numbers.

If you imagined two different cars driving the same course, they might have different times and maximum speeds. But the acceleration profiles would look very similar, as they stopped at the same stop signs and then sped up again. It is the same with the A-D data. The A-D Line represents the total distance traveled, but the McClellan Oscillator measures the accelerations involved with the stops and starts.

The main point to take from this comparison is that there is not a huge amount of difference in the chart structures of each of these versions of the McClellan Oscillator. Obtaining purified breadth data may give a slightly more accurate picture of what a major segment of the stock market is doing, but it is a difficult task not normally available to most analysts. The common only A-D data is typically only available well after the close of a trading day, or not until the weekend if one uses the Barron's numbers.
And as we see from the comparisons of the Oscillator charts, there is not a huge difference in their acceleration behavior.
Tom McClellan
Editor, The McClellan Market Report
Jan 21, 2011
Why Even Fundamental Analysts Should Watch A-D Line |
Aug 20, 2010
Disagreement Between A-D and Volume Lines |
May 07, 2010
What It Takes To Get The Oscillator To Zero |